posted by copper_curious 18d ago

GHK-Cu for hair loss, anyone tried it?

So I know this board is mostly tendons but I use topical GHK-Cu on my face for work all the time and started wondering about the hair angle. There's actually decent human data on GHK-Cu for skin and collagen, way more than most peptide-for-hair claims can say. The theory for scalp is that it helps blood flow to follicles and calms down the inflammation that causes miniaturization in male and female pattern loss. Anyone actually running a copper peptide serum on their scalp, or thought about injecting it for this reason? Curious what's real experience vs wishful thinking here.

Collagen is a process, not a purchase.

10 comments

Add a comment

desk_jockey_danaRaleigh, NC7 points18d ago

Following this, I've been losing hair at the temples for like two years and I'm scared of finasteride sides. Is the scalp serum stuff actually different from what you'd put on your face or is it the same ingredient just marketed different?

Currently typing with correct posture. Probably.

copper_curiousMiami, FL8 points18d ago

Same active ingredient, copper tripeptide-1, usually 1 to 3 percent. A lot of hair serums just repackage the skincare formulation with different marketing copy. The skin data is legit, they've shown it boosts collagen and helps healing in actual trials on people, not just petri dishes. The hair specific stuff is thinner, it's more extrapolated from what we know it does at the tissue level plus some cell culture work showing it can flip on genes tied to follicle cycling.

Collagen is a process, not a purchase.

LabRatLouisBoston, MA4 points18d ago

This is one of the rare peptide-for-hair claims where the underlying biology at least makes sense on paper. Copper is a cofactor for lysyl oxidase, GHK-Cu is angiogenic, and perifollicular inflammation is a real contributor to androgenetic alopecia. None of that means the topical translates to visible regrowth in a normal person's bathroom routine, but it's not pure snake oil logic like some of the other stuff that gets pitched for hair.

Preclinical is not a promise.

rotator_cuff_rickNaperville, IL8 points18d ago

Not to be that guy but half my crew at the station were bald by 40 and none of us ever fixed it with a serum. Genetics wins most of these fights.

Two years of patience beat six months of panic.

tendon_tinkerAustin, TX5 points18d ago

I mean sure but genetics setting the ceiling doesn't mean nothing helps at the margins. I track basically everything and even I wouldn't bother logging hair count, way too noisy a metric without a dermatoscope.

Measure it or it did not happen.

NightShiftNurseSacramento, CA6 points18d ago

I started thinning postpartum and a coworker swore by a copper peptide serum, took like 4 months before she noticed less shedding in the shower. Could be the biotin she was also taking, could be time, hard to isolate one variable when you're doing five things.

Recovery happens at 3am, if it happens.

PharmD_NadiaPhoenix, AZ2 points18d ago

On the injectable question, I'll just say plainly there's no published human trial data for injecting GHK-Cu specifically for hair outcomes. The systemic route theoretically gets copper peptide into circulation and maybe to the scalp, but nobody has actually shown that changes hair. Topical applied right where you want the effect is the more supported route and it's already an established cosmetic ingredient so the risk profile there is very low.

If the vial looks cloudy, the answer is no.

Dr_Rehab_RayCleveland, OH4 points18d ago

Worth saying the skin trials backing this ingredient were about wound healing and skin quality outcomes, not hair. It's a reasonable mechanism story for follicles but it's still a step removed from the actual data. Wouldn't count on it as a standalone fix, more like one piece of a bigger routine alongside whatever else you're doing for scalp health.

Load is the drug with the best data.

desk_jockey_danaRaleigh, NC3 points18d ago

Ok that's helpful, sounds like worth trying topically since the downside is basically nothing, just don't expect miracles. Thanks for the reality check on injecting it, wasn't sure if that was even a thing people did for this.

Currently typing with correct posture. Probably.

copper_curiousMiami, FL1 points18d ago

Yeah that's basically where I landed too. Going topical directly on scalp for a few months and just tracking shedding loosely, not expecting a transformation but the mechanism at least isn't nonsense like some of the stuff marketed at hair loss forums.

Collagen is a process, not a purchase.