posted by BCole_FST 12d ago

What's the standard dosage and cycle length for recovery?

Got a client six weeks out from ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft, and she's asking me about adding BPC-157/TB-500 to speed up graft incorporation. I work in fascial work and behavior change, not injectables, so I'm out of my depth here. Is there an actual standard dose and cycle length people use post-op, or is this more of a case by case thing depending on the surgery type?

Move well first. Everything else follows.

19 comments

Add a comment

GKatz_ATCMid-Atlantic region10 points12d ago

There isn't a single standard. What I've seen used for a graft reconstruction looks nothing like what someone runs for a minor scope cleanup. Tissue involved and load demands change everything.

Twenty plus years keeping athletes on the ice.

ELee_DPTMaryland, Washington D.C. metro area9 points11d ago

There's no standard. Never has been.

Lost my career to a knee. Now I fix them.

BCole_FSTHouston, Texas5 points11d ago

Fair enough, but are there ranges people are actually using for something like a patellar graft? Trying to get a sense of what's common even if it's not official.

Move well first. Everything else follows.

CKmiec_LALos Angeles, California3 points11d ago

I ran BPC-157 after a partial meniscus repair, 250-500mcg daily sub-q for about 8 weeks, felt swelling drop off noticeably by week 3. Nothing scientific about that number, just what my clinic had me do.

Technique first, load second.

ASeconds_SacSacramento, California5 points10d ago

Did similar for a shoulder labrum repair, roughly 6 weeks, felt the difference in range of motion pretty early.

Kettlebells and barbells, ten years in.

LBenz_PTLouisville, Kentucky6 points10d ago

The honest answer is that cycle length should track the tissue healing timeline, not a forum number. Graft revascularization for something like a patellar tendon autograft takes months, so a two week run isn't doing much for that structure. What actually matters is having someone monitoring the recovery alongside the protocol, checking in, adjusting, pulling labs if something looks off, not just handing over a script and disappearing.

Humanize the rehab process.

NOuta_ResearchKenya1 points10d ago

Genuine question, is anyone tracking outcomes systematically or is it all individual reports? The dosing everyone quotes traces back to weight based numbers from rat studies and that conversion to humans is shaky at best.

Science is only useful if people can use it.

MDrake_DPTBaltimore, Maryland5 points10d ago

Even setting the dosing question aside, timeline depends heavily on age, metabolic health, and nutritional status going into the repair. A healthy 25 year old and a 55 year old with a slower healing baseline are not on the same clock even with identical grafts.

Neuro rehab nerd, clinical educator.

BCole_FSTHouston, Texas3 points10d ago

That makes sense. So for something like her patellar graft, would you expect a longer continuous run or more of a cycle on cycle off approach through the full recovery window?

Move well first. Everything else follows.

GKatz_ATCMid-Atlantic region5 points9d ago

For a full reconstruction I've mostly seen longer runs with breaks built in around the 8-10 week mark, then reassess. Arthroscopic cleanups are a much shorter conversation, sometimes just a few weeks.

Twenty plus years keeping athletes on the ice.

DrSempeposBerkeley Heights, NJ2 points9d ago

Worth mentioning that long recovery windows like this are where I see adherence slip and mood dip, especially once the initial pain fades but function still isn't there. Worth checking in with how she's handling the mental side, not just the graft.

Mind and body, same system.

SHathaway_Strong2 points9d ago

Had a client in her sixties post ACL who needed closer to twelve weeks before she felt confident loading the leg again, way beyond the typical timelines you hear for younger athletes.

Strong bones, strong life.

ELee_DPTMaryland, Washington D.C. metro area3 points9d ago

Twelve weeks isn't unusual for that age group, but that's rehab progression, not the peptide cycle itself. Don't conflate the two.

Lost my career to a knee. Now I fix them.

CKmiec_LALos Angeles, California6 points9d ago

Fair distinction honestly.

Technique first, load second.

NOuta_ResearchKenya6 points9d ago

Still think the forum reports are useful as signal but shouldn't be treated as protocol. Too many uncontrolled variables stacked on top of each other.

Science is only useful if people can use it.

LBenz_PTLouisville, Kentucky5 points9d ago

Agreed it's not a protocol, it's anecdote, but anecdote from someone actually monitoring labs and recovery markers is still more useful than guessing blind off a YouTube video. That's the whole point of having a clinician in the loop instead of self dosing off forum numbers.

Humanize the rehab process.

BCole_FSTHouston, Texas5 points9d ago

Update, she found a clinician who actually works with peptides regularly and set her up with monitoring. Four weeks in and swelling is way down, ROM improving faster than her last recovery.

Move well first. Everything else follows.

ASeconds_SacSacramento, California6 points9d ago

That's great to hear, glad she found someone who actually checks in.

Kettlebells and barbells, ten years in.

BCole_FSTHouston, Texas3 points8d ago

Thanks everyone, this actually helped me understand what to look for.

Move well first. Everything else follows.